Tuesday, 13 November 2012

Paper: Valuation of ecosystem services in developing countries.

The following paper is now published in Ecological Economics...

Christie M, Fazey I, Cooper R, Hyde H and Kenter JO. (2012) An Evaluation of Monetary and Non-monetary Techniques for Assessing the Importance of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services to People in countries with developing economies. Ecological Economics, 83, 69-80.

It is based on a Defra funded research project.

Paper abstract.



Biodiversity supports a range of ecosystems services that are of fundamental importance to people in poor countries. Economic valuation of biodiversity is important for the development of policies that protect biodiversity and alleviate poverty. This paper provides an evaluation of monetary and non-monetary techniques for assessing the value of biodiversity to people in least developed countries (LDCs). Specifically, research questions include:
  1. To what extent have monetary and non-monetary techniques been used to assess the value of biodiversity and ecosystem services in LDCs?
  2. What are the key methodological, practical, epistemological and policy challenges to assessing the value of biodiversity and ecosystem services in LDCs?
  3. How can valuation methods be improved to allow more accurate valuation in LDCs?
Our results show that:
  • There is currently a paucity of biodiversity valuation studies in LDCs.
  • Conventional approaches to valuation are often inappropriate for use in LDCs.
  • Incorporating ideas from participatory, deliberative and action research methods into valuation techniques can make them more suitable for use in LDCs.
  • There is a need to build capacity within the academic and policy-making communities in LDCs, to ensure that the benefits of biodiversity are properly accounted for in policy decisions.

Monday, 12 November 2012

Biodiversity vs Carbon?

I'm currently in Panama developing a research proposal that will explore how a 'Payment for Ecosystem Services' (PES) scheme might best be established to manage the land within the Canal's catchment (which is largely rainforest) to deliver a range of 'ecosystem services' (which, in this instance, will be predominantly driven by the management of water flows to feed into the canal). Elsewhere, many similar PES schemes have  been developed under the auspice of the REDD (Reductions in Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation) initiative, in which the driving force for protecting the rainforest has been protecting it as a store of carbon.

Undoubtedly, protecting carbon stores and water flows is extremely important. However, today, whilst overlooking the rainforest canopy from a 40m high observation tower, I started to ponder as to how much I really cared about the fact that I was viewing this immense carbon store. Clearly, I'm not arguing that it's not important to maintain carbon stores, but from my perspective above the canopy protecting rainforests for their carbon (or water management in the case of Panama Canal catchment) really misses the point about rainforests. Rainforests are magical places in which the biodiversity fills you with amazement and awe. Everybody knows about the 'charismatic mega-fauna' such as the Howler monkey I saw today swinging through the canopy with a baby on its back. But to me, it's often the little things that inspire me: the brown tree frogs that are indistinguishable from fallen leaves; the stick insects that you only see after staring at a 'twig' for a few minutes; the army of leaf cutter ants carrying leaves twice their weight; the Kingfisher catching a fish; the lizard that runs on water; the humming birds that dart in and out of flowers; the electric blue flashes of butterflies etc etc. And it's not just what you see that make rainforests special; its a full sensual overload. Its the moist dankness of rotten vegetation mixed with the fragrance of scarlet flowers. Its the deafening morning chorus of Howler monkeys, birds, insects and frogs. Its the mix of large leaves as soft as velvet and trees armoured with needle-like spikes. Its swimming in a cool pool fed by a delightful waterfall or showering in warm rain during a downpour. 

I could go on, but I think you get my point. Rainforests are important for their biodiversity and importantly its the diversity of that biodiversity that leaves you in awe. Every time you venture into a forest you see something else new and amazing. In an era where climate change is a key policy driver, it can be very easy to  get detracted by a single issue - carbon storage and sequestration - while the really important issue (in my view anyway) is to reduce the loss of biodiversity. And I suppose, one of my key challenges in this Panama project (if we get it funded) will be to explore ways in which we can truly reflect and capture the awe-inspiring benefits of rainforest biodiversity and feed this into policy. Also, and importantly, how can we capture 'non-use' values when the majority of the world's population have never visited a rainforest.

Fortunately, it's not a choice of one or the other and there can be win-win solutions where protecting the forest for carbon or water flows will also protect its biodiversity. We just need to make sure that policies and on-the-ground conservation remembers this. 

Unfortunately, I've finished my fun in the forest and now its time to get our heads together in an air conditioned hotel room and write the proposal so that we can ensure that its carbon AND biodiversity and not carbon VS biodiversity !


Monday, 10 September 2012

Paralympics

 Last week I went to Brands Hatch to watch a close friend, Karen Darke (http://karendarke.com/), compete in the paralympics hand-cycling competition. Karen broke her back 20 years ago in a climbing accident while a student in Aberdeen with me. Since then, she has done many amazing things - hand-cycled across the Himalayas, skied across Greenland, climbed El Cap etc etc. Her latest adventure was the Paralympics. Her first race was the time trial, in which she won silver! Great effort


Nice medal - thanks for letting me borrow it!

However, perhaps a more inspiring event was the road road race where after a fierce battle with a friend and training partner (Rachel Morris), the two girls were neck and neck ready to grab the Bronze. However, rather than fight it out to the end, the girls decided to lay aside their competitive streak and cross the finish line in a show of friendship and respect for the efforts that each other had to overcome to get there. In the end, a photo finish awarded Rachel with the medal. In the interview afterwards, Karen stated that 'I got a medal the other day so we both have something to celebrate. We've worked so hard together over the last few years we couldn't bear the thought of pipping each other to the line'. It was a beautify finish and one that very much captures the spirit of the Paralympic games. Well done to you both. 

Karen Darke and Rachel Morris crossing the finish line hand in hand at the Paralympics road race.

Next month, Karen is competing to the World para-triathlon championships in New Zealand (I thinks), and then next year I'm hopefully going on a small trip with her to the South Pole!

Tuesday, 4 September 2012

Two papers in Ecosystem Services is now published online

Two of my papers that are being published in the first edition of Ecosystem Service journal are now available to view online:

Christie and Rayment (2012) An economic assessment of the ecosystem service benefits derived from the SSSI biodiversity conservation policy in England and Wales. Ecosystem Services (In Press)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.004


de Groot et al (2012). Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosystem Services (In Press)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.005  

Monday, 6 August 2012

NERC VNN 'BRIDGE' project secures special issue in Environment and Planning C

My NERC VNN 'BRIDGE' project http://www.valuing-nature.net/projects/bridge  has secured the 'go ahead' for a special issue in Environment and Planning C on 'Embedding an Ecosystems Approach? The Utilisation of Ecological Knowledges in Decision Making'. 


The special issue seeks to better understand the interactions between the supply of, and demand for, ecosystem knowledge in different decision making arenas or venues. Specifically, it aims to:
  • better understand the uptake and immediate influence of ecosystem knowledge in public, private and third sector decision making venues;
  • investigate the sources and processes of ecosystem knowledge development, and how these facilitate or hinder its utilisation in different venues at different levels of governance;
  • explore the scope for bringing ecosystem knowledge into decision-making processes, by examining critical decision making venues where knowledge is (or could in future) be used, such as land use planning, policy appraisal and cost benefit analysis.

The 10 papers to be included in the special issues (subject to peer-review) are based on the papers presented at the VNN BRIDGE 'Decisions' workshop held on 3-4 May 2012. Although we don't have an exact date for this issue, it is likely to be published late 2012 / early 2013. I'll post more detail when we get it.

Many thanks to Duncan Russell and Andy Jordan for all their hard work securing this output.


Friday, 3 August 2012

Today, I start new Professorship in Aber's School of Management and Business

Today, I officially start my new job as Professor of Environmental and Ecological Economics in Aberystwyth University's School of Management and Business. Although it will be sad to leave IBERS (I've been there since 1996), a change is always stimulating. In particular, I'm really excited about the new opportunities that my Professorship will open up to further develop my research and teaching portfolio. It will also be good to  to develop stronger links with the other economists in Aber.

In terms of my contact detail, my email and tel remain unchanged; however, my new work address is:

Prof Mike Christie

School of Management and Business,
Aberystwyth University
Aberystwyth, Ceredigion, Wales, 
SY23 3DD

Monday, 9 July 2012

Third paper accepted for publication in one week!

I'm on a roll ... just had a third paper accepted for publication this week!

Rudolf .S. de Groot; Luke Brander; Sander van der Ploeg; Florence Bernard; Leon Braat;
Mike Christie; Robert Costanza; Neville Crossman; Andrea Ghermandi; Lars Hein (2012). Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosystem Services. In Press

The paper discusses the Ecosystem Service Value Database (ESVD) that was used in the TEEB study. Note that we plan to build up the ESVD database in the future, so that we attain a much more comprehensive suite of value evidence on the value of ecosystem services across different biomes. In turn, this will allow more robust use of value transfers in the future. For more info on ESVD, see http://www.fsd.nl/esp/79128/5/0/50 .

Below is the abstract from the paper...

This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the value of ecosystem services provided by 10 main biomes based on data from local case studies worldwide, expressed in monetary units. In total, over 320 publications were screened covering over 300 case study locations. Approximately 1350 value estimates were coded and stored in a searchable Ecosystem Service Value Database (ESVD). A selection of 665 value estimates were used for the analysis of the methods, locations, ecosystem services, and ranges of values presented in this paper.

Acknowledging the uncertainties and contextual nature of any valuation, the analysis shows that the total Value Estimated in Monetary units (VEM) of ecosystem services is considerable and ranges between 490 int$/year for the total bundle of ecosystem services that can be provided by an ‘average’ hectare of open oceans to almost 350,000 int$/year for the potential services of an ‘average’ hectare of coral reefs.

More importantly, our results show that most of this value is outside the market and best considered as non-tradable public benefits. The continued over-exploitation of ecosystems thus comes at the expense of the livelihood of the poor, and future generations. Given that many of the positive externalities of ecosystems are lost or strongly reduced after land use conversion better accounting for the public goods and services provided by ecosystems is crucial to improved decision making and better management, and new institutions are required for better management.




Thursday, 5 July 2012

'Economic valuation of ecosystem services from SSSIs' paper accepted for publication to Ecosystem Services Journal



My paper, with Matt Rayment 'An economic assessment of the ecosystem service benefits derived from the SSSI biodiversity conservation policy in England and Wales'.has now been accepted for publication of the first edition of the new Ecosystem Services journal. The paper is based on a Defra research project that we completed last year.

Abstract
Despite significant conservation efforts, global biodiversity continues to decline. A key contributing factor has been a failure to fully recognise the range of 'ecosystem service' benefits provided by biodiversity. In this paper, we use a case study relating to Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) in England and Wales to demonstrate the potential ecosystem service benefits that can be derived from biodiversity conservation policies. Our approach involved three stages. (1) a choice experiment to assess the economic value of ecosystem services delivered by SSSI sites; (2) a 'weighting matrix' to (a) assign ecosystem services to the different SSSI habitats and (b) identify the contribution that conservation management on SSSIs has on the delivery of these services; (3) estimation of the aggregated economic value of ecosystem services directly attributable to conservation management on SSSI sites.

The public are willing to pay £956m annually to secure the levels of services and benefits currently delivered by SSSI conservation activities, and a further £769 million to secure the benefits that would be delivered if SSSIs were all in favourable condition. These benefit estimates significantly exceed the annual £111 million costs of managing SSSIs, demonstrating that investing in biodiversity conservation can be cost effective.


Wednesday, 4 July 2012

Website updated to include links to my published papers


I've just updated my website to include links to all my published papers. Follow this link to see more ..

Description: Description: Description: http://i.ehow.com/images/a05/1s/n6/write-excellent-college-paper-800x800.jpg

Tuesday, 3 July 2012

New paper in Land Use Policy: Evaluation of cost-effectiveness of organic farming support as an agri-environmental measure at Swiss agricultural sector level.

A paper by one of my PhD students, Christian Schader, along with myself and several others, have got the following paper accepted in Land Use Policy: Evaluation of cost-effectiveness of organic farming support as an agri-environmental measure at Swiss agricultural sector level.


The paper's abstract is below. I'll provide a web link to the paper when I receive it; but for now feel free to email for a copy.

Abstract

The economic efficiency of financial support of organic farming has been questioned by economists and policy makers. However, little empirical research has been done in order to evaluate the economic performance of these payments. Thus, the aim of this paper is to calculate the cost effectiveness of organic farming support in achieving environmental policy targets compared to other agri-environmental measures.
The cost-effectiveness of agri-environmental measures can be understood as a function of policy uptake, environmental effects, and public expenditure. Taking the Swiss agricultural sector as an empirical case study, cost-effectiveness of organic farming support and other single agri environmental measures was calculated. For this purpose, the sector-representative PMP model FARMIS was extended by three modules encompassing a) life cycle assessments for fossil energy use, biodiversity and eutrophication according to the SALCA methodology, b) public expenditure, including policy-related transaction costs, and c) uptake of agri-environmental measures. The calculations revealed a slightly higher policy cost with organic farming support of 14 CHF/ha for a 1 % average improvement in the environmental indicators, compared to a combination of three single agri-environmental measures (11 CHF/ha), including bothextensification of arable land and meadows. In view of an average public expenditure on agriculture of 2.5 kCHF per ha in Switzerland, these differences can be considered as marginal. Sensitivity analyses confirm that the cost-effectiveness of organic farming support is very similar to combined agri-environmental measures. Furthermore, the model reveals that the cost-effectiveness of specific agri-environmental measures is higher when implemented on organic farms rather than on non-organic farms.

Friday, 29 June 2012

Land Use Policy paper on cost effectivess of organic farming in Switzerland

The following paper with one of my sucessful PhD students, Christian Schader, is now to be published. Details are below... Title: Evaluation of cost-effectiveness of organic farming support as an agri-environmental measure at Swiss agricultural sector level Authors: Christian Schader, PhD; Nic Lampkin; Michael Christie; Thomas Nemecek; Gerard Gaillard; Matthias Stolze Abstract: The economic efficiency of financial support of organic farming has been questioned by economists and policy makers. However, little empirical research has been done in order to evaluate the economic performance of these payments. Thus, the aim of this paper is to calculate the cost- effectiveness of organic farming support in achieving environmental policy targets compared to other agri-environmental measures. The cost-effectiveness of agri-environmental measures can be understood as a function of policy uptake, environmental effects, and public expenditure. Taking the Swiss agricultural sector as an empirical case study, cost-effectiveness of organic farming support and other single agri- environmental measures was calculated. For this purpose, the sector-representative PMP model FARMIS was extended by three modules encompassing a) life cycle assessments for fossil energy use, biodiversity and eutrophication according to the SALCA methodology, b) public expenditure, including policy-related transaction costs, and c) uptake of agri-environmental measures. The calculations revealed a slightly higher policy cost with organic farming support of 14 CHF/ha for a 1 % average improvement in the environmental indicators, compared to a combination of three single agri-environmental measures (11 CHF/ha), including both extensification of arable land and meadows. In view of an average public expenditure on agriculture of 2.5 kCHF per ha in Switzerland, these differences can be considered as marginal. Sensitivity analyses confirm that the cost-effectiveness of organic farming support is very similar to combined agri-environmental measures. Furthermore, the model reveals that the cost-effectiveness of specific agri-environmental measures is higher when implemented on organic farms rather than on non-organic farms.

Monday, 11 June 2012

I'm now a Professor!

I've just been appointed Professor in 'Environmental and Ecological Economics' in Aber Uni's School of Business and Management. Yipee!  Official start date is the 1st August 2012.

I'm really excited about the new post. Not only will a professorship open up new opportunities for new research and teaching, but a move to a new department is always stimulating. In particular, I'm really looking forward to enhanced opportunities to be able to have in-depth discussions on economic concepts with my new colleagues. I've already had a few discussions with people about collaborative research. Also, there appears to be opportunities to develop Master's levels courses that would include environmental economics.

Given that Aber Uni is reasonable small, I already know quite a few of the SMB staff, and they all seem really nice and welcoming.

I will, however, be a bit sad to leave IBERS - I've been there in its various formats since 1996. However, at the moment at least, SMB is next door to IBERS so I'll still see old colleagues and still plan to maintain my working links with them.

Anyway, well done me!!

Wednesday, 16 May 2012

VNN updates

VNN has just published updates talks by the 10 NERC Valuing Nature Network project leaders, which were presented at the VNN meeting on the 26th April 2012. You can find my update of the BRIDGE project there also. See VNN update meeting 26 April 2012 website for more details.

Friday, 11 May 2012

Local Nature Partnerships

In its Natural Environment White Paper, the UK Government recognised that there was a need for local areas to work in a joined up and strategic way to help manage the natural environment to produce multiple benefits for people, the economy and the environment. To achieve this ambition, the White Paper has proposed the establishment of Local Nature Partnerships (LNPs). The vision is that LNP's will comprise a broad range of local organisations, businesses and people with the credibility to work with and influence other local strategic decision makers. The LNPs will thus help their local area to manage the natural environment as a system and to embed its value in local decisions for the benefit of nature, people and the economy. See the Defra LNP website for more details.


Over the past few weeks I have been involved in the setting up of two LNPs:
  • Staffordshire LNP
My input into these start up meetings was to provide a theoretical overview of the ecosystem service benefits that might be provided by nature, and thus help to demonstrate why it is important for local people to work together to protect their natural environment. Could I wish both LNP partnerships the best wishes for their projects, and would encourage other local authorities to also submit their applications into Defra to form such partnerships.


Mike 




Wednesday, 2 May 2012

NERC VNN BRIDGE: 'Decisions' Workshop. 



The third of our BRIDGE project's workshop will be held over the next few days (3-4 May 2012). During the workshop, we will be exploring in detail how decision makers (policy makers, businesses and consumers) can best utilise value evidence in order to improve their decision making. For more detail of BRIDGE, see http://www.valuing-nature.net/projects/bridge

Monday, 30 April 2012

South Pole expedition



In 2013, I'm planning to ski to the South Pole. The Pole of Possibility expedition is unique in that one of our team, Karen Darke, is paralysed from the chest down. For more information on the South Pole expedition, visit the PoP expedition website: http://www.poleofpossibility.com/

My new Blog!



Lets get Blogging! 

Time to move into the 21st Century and create my own Blog site. 

Through this Blog, I hope to keep you all up-to-day with what I'm doing, and in particular use the Blog as a portal for my research activities - more later!

Anyway, to find out more about me, you can visit my website: